23948sdkhjf
Log in or create to bookmark articles
Get access to all content on Defence Nordic
Advertisement
Advertisement

Denmark extends rifle deal worth up to 3 billion kroner

The new seven-year framework reinforces single-supplier sustainment of the C7/C8 fleet as technical constraints and uncertain demand continue to limit competition
Advertisement

Denmark’s defence procurement authority is preparing to extend and expand its framework agreement for the maintenance and sustainment of the armed forces’ standard-issue rifles without opening the contract to competition. 

The move centres on the C7/C8 rifle family and would continue cooperation with the original manufacturer, Colt Canada.

Advertisement

The Danish Ministry of Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organisation (FMI), has issued a voluntary ex-ante transparency notice signalling its intention to negotiate directly with the Canadian supplier. 

The proposed framework carries a maximum value of DKK 3.1 billion, with an estimated value of DKK 1.8 billion. It would cover maintenance, spare parts and replacement procurement, alongside the potential acquisition of additional weapons within the same platform.

Advertisement

Technical dependency

The justification for bypassing competition rests on technical and legal constraints. According to the notice, Colt Canada, the original equipment manufacturer of the C7/C8 system, holds exclusive rights and the technical knowledge required to service and maintain the rifles.

This includes control of intellectual property and access to proprietary documentation needed to ensure compatibility between weapons, spare parts and associated services. 

Advertisement

The expected lifespan of the rifle system exceeds 28 years, reinforcing the case for continuity in maintenance and supply.

The planned agreement has an initial duration of seven years, with extension options that could extend certain elements to 2054. However, the overall financial scope remains uncertain.

FMI notes that future demand will depend on evolving operational requirements, including deployments in mission areas that cannot be predicted over the contract period. 

Advertisement

This uncertainty is reflected in the gap between estimated and maximum contract values, allowing flexibility for increased usage if required.

Advertisement
Equipment See topic
Advertisement Advertisement
BREAKING
{{ article.headline }}
0.046|